John: A shortfall in federal public transportation funding is threatening bus and metro systems across the country.

When ridership dropped during the pandemic, the government spent billions of dollars to support public transit.

But that money has largely run out.

And now, with inflation added to the mix, local governments are saddled with hundreds of millions of dollars in deficits, leading to reduced services and increased fares.

Ali rogin explores the effect all of this is having beyond the morning commute with Philip plotch, the principal researcher and senior fellow at the Eno center for transportation.

Ali: Philip plotch, thank you for joining us.

How did regional public transit systems find themselves at the edge of this financial cliff?

Philip: So you might remember when the pandemic first hit, there was a real concern about a potential for a real economic crisis in the United States.

That's why the government, the federal government, pumped so much money into the economy.

They lent a lot of money to small businesses, money was given to schools, local governments, and about $70 billion with a B went to keep public transportation running across the country.

The thinking was people needed to get the jobs.

- - Get to jobs supermarkets and , hospitals.

And remember, we wanted all of our frontline workers to get to work.

The programs worked, the economy kept chugging along, but now many agencies are running out of money because ridership is down.

So compared to what it was before the pandemic, about 14% fewer people are taking the bus and about 28% fewer are taking the train.

So the transit agencies, they're making cuts, they've been stretching out the covid funding.

They've just been hoping that the state and local governments are going to help bail them out before their money runs out.

That's why many of them are now staring at the edge of a cliff without any good options.

Ali: And how is this disrupting the average commuter who is still trying to get to work every day right now?

Philip: If you're a transit rider, you might need it to get to a job or a medical appointment, school or grocery store.

You might not be able to get there if you don't have the bus service or the train service.

Or they're gonna be more crowded.

Or you're gonna have to wait longer.

And sometimes the long wait, we're not talking about 10 or 15 minutes.

So imagine you take one bus to another bus and you need a transfer.

If that second bus is only running one every hour, your one hour bus ride could turn into a two hour bus drive really fast.

If we cut service across the country at transit agencies, it affects people who don't use transit.

So there's more traffic on the roads.

It's harder to find parking spaces.

When there's more traffic in a city, it slows down emergency vehicles.

It really hurts everybody.

Ali: So let's talk a little bit more about what we saw in Philadelphia.

It's sort of a case study in how this is playing out.

What's been happening there and what are the chances that it's going to repeat itself in other cities like San Francisco, Chicago and the like?

Philip: So Philadelphia has been staring down a $200 million annual shortfall, $200 million and they put a plan together to cut service, eliminate rous, and to stop service in late evening and early in the morning.

And a judge put it on hold, so they are gonna continue the service.

But what they're doing now is possibly worse.

They're taking money that was set aside for improving their system, and now they're using it to keep running the same level of service they had.

So it's sort of like, if you set aside money to, let's say, fix up your roof to pay your grocery bills, the water's gonna keep seeping in into your leaky roof.

It might ruin the ceiling, it might ruin the wiring, so you can spend $1,000 now to fix up your roof, but it could cost you $30,000 later if you're not taking care of it.

That's going to happen at transit agencies if they start taking the money set aside for upgrading their system to use it just to run their day-to-day service.

At some point, things just break down more often and they're more expensive over the long term and they are not as safe.

So the transit agencies are really trying to avoid what they refer to as a death spiral.

That means they cut service, so service is less attractive, and fewer people are going to be using it.

And then because fewer people are using it, they have to cut service.

And it's really sad for people who really need to use public transportation.

Ali: But this is also happening or has the potential to happen in other cities, right?

Philip: Some cities have already taken care of this problem.

They've sort of gotten ahead of it.

So Massachusetts recently passed a millionaire's tax.

And money is going to be used for their transit authority up in Boston.

In New Jersey, the state legislature is taking money from the tolls from the New Jersey turnpike and the garden state parkway.

Minnesota increased their sales tax and their gas tax to pay for more.

But there are places that are really taking a hit.

And San Francisco, you mentioned, that's going to be a big problem.

So San Francisco has two things going on.

The bay area, a lot more people work from home than any other region, so there's fewer people.

Also, they relied on their fare.

The Bart system, that's the bay area rapid transit, they relied about 70% of their expenses came from the fares and from parking fees.

Now, because the ridership has plummeted so much, only about 20% of the money is coming in.

So they really have to look for the local and state governments for help.

So it's really-- it's different.

Every city is different.

Pittsburgh is facing a big problem.

While other places aren't necessarily going through the same thing.

Ali: Philip plotch with the Eno center for transportation, thank you so much.

Philip: And thank you for informing all of your listeners.

♪